|
Events follow each other at an incredible pace.
Sometimes, several occur simultaneously. Their
inherent significance and usefulness as examples
is what I wish to, or, better, feel compelled to
comment on. I am not referring, today, to what
occurred in Geneva, which is considered a
well-deserved revolutionary victory for Third
World nations. Rather, I shall refer to Cuba's
response to the European Council on Foreign
Relations, published last Friday, June 22, on
Gramna's front page.
The statement was a response worthy
of our Revolution and its high political
leadership. One by one, all points calling for
an immediate response from Cuba were addressed
and clarified. Allow me to enumerate and go over
them again:
-
"A dialogue between sovereign and equal
partners, devoid of any conditions or
impending threats, is the only possible
dialogue with Cuba.
If the European Union wishes to engage in
any form of dialogue with Cuba, it must
definitively eliminate those sanctions,
which have since proved impracticable and
unsustainable”.
-
“The 'Conclusions’ also failed to mention
the so-called ‘Common Position', hastily
agreed upon by EU Ministers of Finance in
1996 under pressures from Aznar and on the
basis of a draft drawn up by the US State
Department”.
-
“After so many mistakes and failures, the
only obvious conclusion that the European
Union should fittingly draw is that the
so-called 'Common Position’ must disappear,
since there were and there are no reasons
whatsoever for its existence and because it
hinders any normal, mutually respectful
relationship of common interest with our
country”.
-
“A group of influential European nations
have tried to change this ludicrous
situation. Others, such as the Czech
Republic, have confirmed to be American
pawns on the European map. The ‘Conclusions
of the Council’ slanderously meddle in
matters that are of Cuba's strict concern,
pass judgment and announce intrusive and
hypocritical actions that Cuba regards as
offensive and unacceptable and strongly
repudiates”.
-
“Cuba is an independent and sovereign
country and the European Union is wrong if
it believes it can treat it as anything
other than an equal”.
-
“The European Union has shown persistent and
humiliating subordination to the United
States, of a kind that renders it incapable
of holding positions based on European
interests and turns it into an accomplice,
despite all talk to the contrary, to the
criminal and inhuman blockade that the US
imposes on the Cuban people, and about which
the ‘Conclusions’ did not even dare say a
single word”.
-
“In the European Union Summit with the
United States last April, it stooped to
questioning Cuba and accepted a reference
that acknowledges the legitimacy of the
“Bush Plan.” Known are its collusion with
the Empire's envoys and even with the
spurious inspector for Cuba appointed by the
United States”.
-
“The European Union is shamelessly
hypocritical when it unjustly points its
finger at Cuba while it remains silent about
acts of US-coordinated torture at the
illegal Guantánamo Naval Base, which
encroaches upon Cuban territory, and at Abu
Ghraib, where these are even administered to
European citizens”.
-
“It impudently remains silent about
kidnappings by US Special Forces in third
countries and has offered its territory to
cooperate with the CIA's secret flights and
to harbor illegal prisons. Nor has it said
anything about the hundreds of persons who
have disappeared as a result of these
actions or about the hundreds of thousands
of civilians murdered in Iraq”.
-
“It is the European Union which must
rectify the mistakes it has made with
respect to Cuba”.
At the risk of turning this into an extensive
reflection, I wish to add a number of facts. The
European Union has been led by Washington to a
mighty cul-de-sac. The Cold War ended with the
triumph of the real consumerism of developed
capitalism, and the frantic impulse to consume
that had been awakened in broad sectors of the
populations of the socialist block and Soviet
Union. They had lost the battle of ideas. The
Russian people, the main moving force behind the
October Revolution, were violently deprived of
important commitments which encompassed
agreements and guarantees for its security and
sovereignty: Europe was stripped of over 400
SS-20 missiles, as NATO described them. These
mobile missiles, fitted with three nuclear
warheads each, were pointed to every corner in
Europe where US military bases and NATO forces
were located. In its triumphalist intoxication,
the aggressive military alliance had taken under
its wing many former socialist republics of
Europe, a number of which, seeking economic
benefits, have made the rest of Europe a hostage
of their foreign policy, which unconditionally
serves the strategic interests of the United
States.
All European Union members have the right to
veto a decision. This system is politically
dysfunctional and curtails, in practice, the
sovereignty of all members. The European Union
is today in worse shape than the former
socialist block ever was. The vain Tony Blair,
manufacturer of sophisticated submarines and a
friend of Bush, is already being announced as a
potential future candidate to chair the European
Union. The cables bring the news today that he
was appointed special envoy for the Middle East,
where he so amply contributed to that disastrous
war unleashed by the United States.
In the energy sector, we see European
governments beg for oil in the few regions in
the world where the empire has not forcibly
appropriated this resource, in much the same way
it purchases, with worthless bills, any European
company it pleases.
The euro, however, is a stable currency, much
more than the dollar, which is constantly being
devalued. Even though the dollar is defended by
the holders of US bonds and bills, the empire
faces the risk of an economic disaster of
dramatic repercussions.
Europe, on the other hand, would be one of the
areas most severely affected by global warming.
Its well-known and modern port facilities would
end up underwater.
Today, it desperately proposes free trade
agreements with Latin America which are worse
than Washington's, in search of raw materials
and bio-diesel. We are beginning to hear
criticisms about this. But Europe's money is not
in the hands of the Community, it belongs to
transnational corporations which may relocate to
countries where labor is cheap in search of
profits.
Cuba’s proud and honorable response has
underscored the essentials.
Though every good strategy includes a good
tactic, neither of the two are sound if
arrogance and smugness are tolerated.
Europeans themselves will one day come to
understand the absurd situation they were led to
by imperialism and will realize that a Caribbean
country pointed out some necessary truths for
them. The wild horse of consumerism cannot
continue to gallop madly ahead, for such a race
is unsustainable.
The last European Union meeting held to address
the future community treaty was further proof of
the demoralization of Europe. Last Sunday, June
24, the AFP reported that Italian Prime Minister
Romano Prodi expressed his "bitterness” over the
Brussels summit, where he accused European Union
leaders of staging the spectacle of an
emotionless Europe, in an interview for La
Repubblica newspaper.
"'As a European, allow me to be embittered for
the spectacle I find myself in front of’, Prodi,
ex-chairman of the European Commission, said.
"’The doggedness of some governments to negate
every emotional aspect of Europe has hurt me',
he added, referring to Poland, the Czech
Republic, the Netherlands and Great Britain.
“’And then these are the same governments that
rebuke Europe for being far from citizens’, he
affirmed.
"’But how can you involve citizens without
involving their emotions? How can you give them
pride to be European if the symbols of its pride
[such as the flag and hymn]
are negated?’ he asked”.
“Prodi lambasted [Tony Blair] for ‘conducting a
battle’ against the EU Charter of Fundamental
Rights”.
“He criticized Polish President Lech
Kaczynski, who said he could not share his
stances because Italy and Poland were 'very
different nations'”.
“Prodi concluded by saying that
'never before had Eurosceptics expressed
themselves so explicitly and programmatically'
as in the last Summit”.
At the last G-8 meeting, Bush had
sent Europeans a chilly message.
At this decisive point in time, the
number of enemies one has, which will be fewer
and fewer with time, is of no importance. What
is important is “the stars we carry on our
foreheads.”
Fidel Castro Ruz
June 27, 2007
6:30 pm.
|