|
In the reflection titled “Bush in the Sky”,
published by our newspapers this past March 23rd,
I claimed Bush would get up to his old tricks during the
NATO meeting in the Romanian capital of Bucharest, held from
the 1st to the 3rd of April.
Important events are taking place in Europe. To
ignore them would be to remain ignorant of today’s dilemmas.
With enough patience to get through the next few pages,
readers will have access to news that were extracted from a
sea of information, news which see the light of day at
different times and on different days, thrown together with
other headlines, vital and not.
Athens, April 3rd (EFE)
According to the EFE, Greek nationalists celebrated having
prevented Macedonia’s entry into NATO today. At the root of
this is the unresolved Athens-Skopje dispute over
Macedonia’s name, which has been going on for 17 years now.
The Greek press was unanimous, that Thursday, in
calling the veto that prevented Macedonia’s entry into NATO
a success, a decision that was confirmed today at the summit
meeting that this military organization held in Bucharest.
Above all else, the media underscored the intense
pressures Washington brought to bear on the organization to
have it accept Macedonia’s entry into NATO, and expressed a
sense of nationalist pride in noting Athens did not yield to
these pressures.
As a headline of the Athenian newspaper Avriani
announced, Bush’s blackmail did not go down well, but
Kostas Karamanlis will go down in Greece’s history for the
veto against Bush’s designs.
Bucharest, April 4th (EFE)
The EFE reported that the White House expressed its
satisfaction over the results obtained at the summit, where
the allies promised to base more troops in Afghanistan,
backed US plans to set up an anti-missiles shield in Eastern
Europe and promised that the Ukraine and Georgia would be
accepted as members of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization in the future.
Tirana, April 3rd (EFE)
According to EFE's article, Albania’s political class
enthusiastically welcomed NATO's official invitation for
Albania to join the organization.
Albanian members of parliament, who convened for an
extraordinary session, called the day "historical" and
extolled it as the country’s most important event since the
proclamation of Kosovo’s independence this past February 17th
and the creation of the Albanian state in 1912.
President of Parliament Jozefina Topalli thanked
all nations that supported Albania’s entry in NATO and US
President George W. Bush in particular.
The invitation, Topalli said, marks the end of
Albania’s political transition and the first step towards
Euro-Atlantic integration the country has taken in these
past 17 years of democracy.
Minister for the Economy Genc Ruli stated that
Albania's entry into NATO means more stability and security
and, therefore, more foreign investment, essential to the
economic development of one of Europe's poorest countries.
The main streets in the Albanian capital were
embellished today with the flags of NATO and Albania.
Madrid, April 4th (DPA)
This article opens with a question: Isolated from the rest
of the world? The image of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero,
sitting alone next to empty chairs before the table at the
NATO summit meeting, while George W. Bush and other leaders
speak animatedly nearby, was the front-page photo of the
main Spanish newspapers today and revived debates on the
foreign policies of the Spanish socialist government.
In addition to commenting on the controversial
photograph, newspapers and radio and television talk shows
underscored the absence of a meeting between Zapatero and
Bush, which La Moncloa had announced as a fait accompli
after the US leader phoned his Spanish counterpart to
congratulate him for his electoral victory of March 9th.
Bush's relationship with Zapatero has been cold and
distant since the socialist came to power for, almost
immediately after his election, in April 2004, the latter
withdrew the 1,300 thousand Spanish soldiers who were based
in Iraq.
At no point did the United States or Bush tried to
conceal their disapproval towards this. Since then, there
hasn't been a single bilateral meeting between the two.
Neither Bush has officially visited Spain since
then, nor Zapatero been in the White House. Just the
contrary occurred with the previous Spanish president, the
conservative José María Aznar…his was one of four faces
which appear in another well-known photo: the one taken at
the Azores summit, in which Great Britain and the United
States hatched the plans for an intervention in Iraq which
Spain supported.
Exchanges between Bush and Zapatero in Bucharest
were limited to a “Hello, hello, congratulations”, from the
US to the Spanish leader, which newspapers satirized as the
"three-word encounter".
Bucharest, April 4th (ANSA)
ANSA reports that in his closing remarks at the NATO summit,
US President George W. Bush handed over the helm to his
Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on a silver platter.
According to analysts, the US President’s farewell
remarks, which marked the debut of his French counterpart
Nicolas Sarkpozy and the British Premier Gordon Brown, will
be remembered for Bush’s absurd insistence on requesting the
immediate entry of Georgia and the Ukraine into the
alliance, against the obvious opposition of the remaining
members.
It was "Old Europe", with the French-German axis at
the helm in its criticisms of the war in Iraq, which
levelled a scathing "no" at President Bush.
The US President appeared unusually nervous at the
Bucharest summit. Diplomatic sources even speak of harsh
words spoken with his Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice,
who tried to convince him of abandoning a "lost cause", at
least at that summit.
Bush’s nervousness was also evident in his sudden
interruption of the press conference held at Romanian
President Traian Basescu's summer residence, when the
European head of state was attempting to answer a question
concerning US treatment of Romanians who seek to travel to
the United States.
Bush's irritation over the length of the summit
meetings, where the 26 heads of State took the floor, also
came to fore. The president abandoned the debates on
Afghanistan inopportunely, leaving behind some members of
his team and several journalists who were covering his trip.
Bush also reacted adversely to a New York Times
article which commented on the “invisibility” of the US
White House chief in the midst of the electoral campaigns
and despite warnings of an economic recession.
Bush had but one triumph at Bucharest: securing
NATO’s support for his "space shield” plans with a view to
holding a morning meeting with Putin at the Sochi spa, on
the Black Sea.
According to analysts, Bush will have the
opportunity to put some order to the United State’s
conflictive relations with Russia, which have reached their
thorniest point since the conclusion of the Cold War.
Bucharest, April 4th, 2008 (AFP)
According to the AFP, in a rare cooperative gesture, Russia
arrived at an agreement with NATO in Bucharest on Friday, to
permit the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance to use its
territory to transport non-military equipment to its troops
in Afghanistan.
The agreement concerning Afghanistan was the only
concrete step taken by the two parties at the NATO-Russia
Council meeting held on Friday at the Bucharest House of
Parliament.
Non-military equipment for ISAF (International
Security Assistance Force based in Afghanistan) may be
transported through Russian territory, NATO Secretary
General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said.
The ISAF, led by NATO since 2003, is today made up
of 47,000 officers from 39 countries.
In response to a request for reinforcements for
military headquarters, to combat ferocious Taliban
resistance in southern and eastern Afghanistan, NATO
countries offered troops that more than substantially swell
these forces.
France, for instance, will send an additional
battalion of some 700 soldiers that will be deployed in the
country's east.
As more troops are deployed and spending increases,
the agreement with Russia should lower costs, as it will
make it possible to transport, by train, supplies which had
hitherto been sent to Afghanistan by air.
Rogozin, the Russian ambassador to NATO, had stated
that the fate of Russia and NATO in Afghanistan were
interdependent, as both stood to lose if the Taliban ever
returned to power.
Bucharest, April 4, 2008 (AFP)
Though President George W. Bush affirmed that the Cold War
had ended, AFP tells us, the summit meeting between NATO and
Russia held in Bucharest this week demonstrated that the
former enemies continue to lock horns over nearly all
issues: Georgia and the Ukraine, Kosovo’s independence, the
anti-missiles shield, Iran and the Treaty on Conventional
Armed Forces in Europe.
“NATO cannot guarantee its own security by
expanding to other countries”, Putin told Western leaders.
The facts are evident: since the end of the Cold
War, NATO's membership has grown from 16 to 28, absorbing
nearly all of the former communist block —Poland, Hungary,
the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and
Slovenia—and three former Soviet republics: Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia.
In the heat of this geopolitical battle, on
Thursday Putin managed to convince the 26 allies to postpone
granting Georgia and Ukraine the candidacy to join the
organization, a move strongly backed by President Bush and a
step towards becoming full members.
But Putin’s partial triumph does not dispel
Russia’s concerns over the fact that NATO promised these two
former Soviet republics that they would one day join the
Alliance.
NATO’s declaration adds to the questions and
preoccupations in Russia with respect to the direction of
NATO’s evolution. A Russian authority referred to it as an
alliance that assumes global functions, with no limits on
its rights to use force.
Zagreb, April 4th (EFE)
The EFE reports that US President George W. Bush arrived
today at 15:00 hours, local time.
The President’s visit is his first official visit
to Croatia since it declared independence from the former
Yugoslavia.
The US president arrived from Bucharest, where he
attended the NATO summit, in which Croatia and Albania
received official invitations to join the Alliance.
Croatian authorities announced earlier today that
everything was ready for Bush's visit, which posed the
greatest challenge to the country's security forces that
they had faced to date.
While these news reached us from the Balkans, in
Europe's south-east, where numerous countries are fighting
over the "honour" of being devoured by the empire's economic
and financial system in order to improve their material
living conditions, which have nothing in common with those
of the underdeveloped world, a news cable issued by the EFE
on April 2nd reported the following:
World Bank (WB) President Robert Zoellick called
today for coordinated global action to address rising food
prices which, coupled to increasingly high energy prices,
threaten to destabilize 33 countries around the world.
Zoellick referred to this coordinated action as one
of the four measures which need to be implemented
immediately to secure a sustainable process of globalization
and minimize the effects of today's international financial
crisis on the developing world.
He called for a global trade agreement at the Doha
round of negotiations, which must be arrived at “now or
never”.
He also called for greater transparency in the raw
materials sector in the developing world, with a view to
giving greater impetus to growth.
His speech, delivered at a hotel in the US capital
on the eve of the WB and IMF spring meeting to be held in
Washington next week, comes at a moment of great economic
uncertainty for the world.
To achieve all this, we must confront problems such
as skyrocketing basic food prices, which result, among other
factors, from energy sector recovery.
Zoellic stressed that basic food prices have gone
up by 80 percent since 2005. He pointed out that, last month
alone, the rice and wheat prices reached their highest,
reported in the last 19 and 28 years, respectively.
The World Bank estimates that 33 countries around
the world face potential social or political crises as a
result of high food and energy prices, he stated.
He pointed out that demographic conditions, a
change in people’s diets, energy and biofuel prices and
climate change suggest that the high and volatile costs of
food will be with us in years to come.
In view of this situation, he proposed the creation
of what he described as a New Agreement for a Global Food
Policy, which ought to focus not only on hunger,
malnutrition and access to food products, but also on other
factors such as the connections those prices have to energy
or climate change.
Food policy needs to draw the attention of the top
political circles, because no country or group of countries
can face these interconnected challenges alone, he
concluded.
These two institutions, the World Bank and the IMF,
are part of the imperialist system.
The first news of Bush’s risky trip to Russia came
from the very military plane that took him and his vast
entourage there, to Sochi, a city on the shores of the Black
Sea.
Reporters from several western press agencies
travelled with him.
An AFP cable dated April 4th reported:
“President George W. Bush told NATO allies that
the United States would send more troops to Afghanistan next
year, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Friday.
"(…) The president indicated that he expected in 2009 the
United States would make a significant additional
contribution," he said.
“Gates said bipartisan support for such a move in the United
States was strong enough to allow Bush to make the pledge
even though he will no longer be president."
From Moscow, an EFE cable dated April 5th
reported:
US President George W. Bush arrived today in Sochi,
where he will consult his Russian counterpart Vladmir Putin
and Dimitri Medvedev, who will become Russia’s head of State
next May 7th.
The last meeting between Bush and Putin will focus
on Washington’s plans to deploy parts for its anti-missiles
shield in Eastern Europe, a move which had just met with
NATO's support and to which Russia is resolutely opposed.
Tomorrow, Sunday, the Russian and US presidents
also plan on signing a document that will set down a
strategic framework to guide relations between the two
countries under the leadership of their respective
successors.
The document must be an honest instrument, for
there are problems that cannot be ignored, said Serguei
Prijodko, foreign policy advisor for the Kremlin chief, as
quoted by the Russian agency Interfax.
He stressed that significant differences still
exist between Moscow and Washington with respect to
anti-missile defence systems, on strategic arms reduction
plans following the expiration of the START-1 Treaty and the
inadmissible nature of militarizing the cosmos.
Among these differences, Prijodjo also pointed out
the differing stances on NATO’s expansion, particularly into
the former Soviet republics of the Ukraine and Georgia.
Bush’s visit to Sochi, the last in his tour of
Eastern Europe, will last less than 24 hours.
On April 5th, the German agency DPA
reported:
Tying lose ends, getting in step with each other,
Presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin prepare for
their meeting at the Sochi spa, next to the Black Sea, with
a view to sparing their successors political burdens.
It was Bush who chose Putin's summer residence as
the venue for their last meeting: his parents had been
delighted with their private visit, in 2003, to this
mansion, erected following Stalin’s death. The locality will
also host the 2014 Winter Olympics.
The two presidents availed themselves of many of
their 23 meetings to compliment each other in public.
But, beneath such personal sympathies, there are
more than enough reasons for political friction. One of them
is the United States' controversial plan to erect an
anti-missiles defence system in the Czech Republic and
Poland. In Kiev, Bush had cautiously stated he hoped to find
common ground in this dispute.
The Vice-President of Russia's Academy for
Security, Defence and Order, General Viktor Yessin, affirmed
there were reasons for cautious optimism.
Different kinds of speculations also surround Bush
and Putin’s last meeting: some believe the presidents plan
on an agreement to construct a means of transportation that
will connect the two countries via Alaska, a project which
had already been conceived in the time of the tsars.
The media began to speculate on this when the rich
governor of Chukotka, Roman Abramovich, ordered the largest
tunnel boring drill in the world from the construction
company Herrenknecht.
A Kremlin spokesperson commented on the rumours
surrounding the 42 billion-euro (66 million-dollar)
100-kilometer tunnel.
On April 6th, the French agency AFP
reported:
Putin declared that he was prudently optimistic
about a definitive agreement and that he felt it was
feasible.
Bush stated he wants to establish a personal
relationship with elected Russian President Dimitri Medvedev
that will allow the two of them to work together on common
problems.
Bush, who participated at the NATO summit in
Bucharest on Friday, arrived in Sochi with the support of
the Alliance for the US anti-missile shield project.
Plans exist to expand the US defence system with a
battery of 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and an
ultra-modern radar in the Czech Republic, which would be in
operations until 2012.
Upon his return to the US capital, the EFE reported
in a cable dated April 6th:
US President George W. Bush returned to Washington
today with much pending work in his agenda as regards
relations with Russia, as he himself has recognized.
The US – Russia meeting closed with the signature
of a strategic framework agreement which sets down the major
lines that are to guide future bilateral relations in such
areas as the struggle against terrorism and the economy.
But the document also clearly reveals the profound
differences that persist between Washington and Moscow with
respect to the anti-missiles shied that the United States
plans on constructing in Eastern Europe, one of the
thorniest issues in the bilateral relations of recent
months.
Putin declared that the devil hides in the
small-print. It is important for experts to decide what the
guarantee measures will be and how they will be implemented.
There is also discussion surrounding matters such
as the expansion of NATO towards the east, particularly
towards the former Soviet republics of the Ukraine and
Georgia.
When they met 7 years ago, Bush stated he had
looked into Putin’s eyes and had been able to glimpse his
soul. The two leaders have maintained a good personal
relationship, despite the deterioration of their country's
relations.
Now, Bush and Medvedev have got off on a different
foot. While at their first meeting the US president welcomed
Putin with an embrace, he only shook his successor's hand.
And if he looked into his eyes and glimpsed his soul, he
certainly didn’t say so, the cable ironically concluded.
For an immense country such as Russia, Eastern
Europe is not only a place of culture, art, history and
refined sciences or a producer of well-known wines, goose
liver, all imaginable types of cheese and other exquisite
and costly products from the countryside and city. It is
also a consumer of Russian oil, gas, gold, nickel and raw
materials, an instrument for capital flight and brain drain,
for the squandering of food products, converted into the
ethanol used by their luxurious and unaffordable
automobiles. The whole world knows this.
Asia is far more important than Europe for Russia,
for Asia’s international trade institutions, through the
Shanghai Group, open more doors to the World Trade
Organization, where Bush has offered to support Putin in his
aim to have Russia join this organization.
What interest does the United States have in
setting up space bases, radars and launching platforms in
Europe and everywhere, if it is not in using these to
threaten Russia? Obviously, the weapons it could aim at
Russia could also be aimed at China and all other countries,
without exception, to turn them into the allies or enemies
of an empire whose economic and political system is
unsustainable.
The United States is heading towards trade
protectionism to maintain employment indices at home, where
its employees cannot compete against the millions of people
in the Third World who, through great sacrifices, produce
quality consumer goods at much lower costs, goods which
transnational corporations later sell in search of surplus
value.
All the while, Bush declares terrorist whatever
countries he pleases.
I decided not to divide this reflection into two
parts, risking a lengthy text.
I have still to address an issue which, though less
significant, I would like to analyze separately because of
its concrete relationship to our country. I shall do so on a
different occasion.
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 6, 2008
6:45 p.m.
|