"Cuba believes that
the U.S. attempt to condemn the island at the UN
Human Rights Commission (HRC) was a deafening
defeat and that the majority rejection of the
amendment presented by Costa Rica constitutes a
clear signal that the greater part of the
international community recognizes our right to
apply laws in defense of national sovereignty,"
confirmed Felipe Pérez Roque at a press conference
in which he recounted the most important aspects
of the debate at the HRC in Geneva.
He noted that it is
likewise an acknowledgement of the pertinence and
legality of the measures adopted by Cuba in
defense of its sovereignty and to punish, in line
with our laws and full guarantees, groups of
individuals acting in the service and on the
payroll of a foreign power that is harassing it,
or committing crimes defined by international laws
as terrorism and severely punished by Cuban
legislation.
The Cuban foreign
minister noted that it has once again been
corroborated that in present conditions, above all
after the aggression against Iraq, the European
Union (EU) unfortunately lacks the capacity to
formulate its own independent policy on Cuba,
"although we trust that one day, a more mature EU,
more clear as to its objectives and
responsibilities in the world, will erase this
shameful page of its relations with our
country."
Later in the
conference Pérez Roque recalled that the post of
UN high commissioner for human rights has only
existed for nine years and Cuba was the first
Latin American country to invite that post holder
to visit the country in 1994. However, the former
high commissioner waited five years for an
invitation from the U.S. government, which sharply
informed her that there was nothing to be
concerned about in relation to human rights and
did not invite her.
"Cuba is not refusing
to cooperate with the high commissioner, quite the
opposite, but what it is not prepared to accept is
the manipulation of this issue, the unscrupulous
employment of this UN figure to justify the
campaign against our country and to maintain the
blockade," he explained.
DEATH PENALTY AS AN
EXCEPTIONAL RESORT
The Cuban foreign
minister observed that certain persons have said
that the death penalty has been applied to
political dissidents, while referring to common
criminals with appalling criminal records who
endangered the lives of people traveling aboard a
vessel by committing an act of
terrorism.
He clarified that the
Cuban government does not support the death
sentence. "We would like not to have it one day.
It is not consubstantial with our philosophy of
life. For us today, it is no more than a
exceptional resort to which we only have recourse
to for reasons of cause majeur, with which we have
had to defend a country under attack for more than
40 years.
"It is true that we
have had to do it now, to avert the creation of a
situation in Cuba, a crisis, a migratory incident
aspired to by the sectors in the United States
that want a war. It has been applied to avert that
war, to save lives. We have had to make a painful
decision, which we did not enjoy, quite the
opposite, because we have on our shoulders the
lives of millions of Cubans and tens of thousands
of U.S. citizens who would lose their lives in a
confrontation between the two
countries."