· We set out to
halve by 2015 the 1.276 billion human beings in abject
poverty that existed in 1990. More than 46 million
impoverished people would have to be reduced every year.
However, excluding China, between 1990 and 2000 extreme
poverty increased by 28 million people. Poverty does not
diminish; it grows.
· We wanted to
halve by 2015 the 842 million people in starvation around
the world. Some 28 million of them had to be reduced every
year. However, there has been a mere reduction of 2.1
million hungry people per annum. At this pace, the goal
would be achieved by 2215, some 200 years after the foreseen
timetable. I am afraid that by then none of us will be able
to see it.
· We proclaimed the
aspiration to reach universal primary education by 2015.
However, more than 120 million children, one in every five
in that school age, do not attend primary schools. According
to UNICEF, at the current rate the goal will be met after
2100.
· We undertook to
reduce by two thirds the mortality rate in children under
five years of age. However, every year continues to see the
death of 13 million children of diseases that can be either
prevented or
cured.
The situation is worse, esteemed colleagues, and
there is absolutely no reason for us to make an optimistic
assessment of what is happening. There is an increase in poverty, in
exclusion and an aggravation in the degradation of the
environment.
Second: The main reason why, instead of
moving forward, there is a step backwards is that there are no new,
non-conditioned financial resources to implement the programs that
would enable us to meet the Millennium Goals. Our 132 countries are
net providers of financial flows towards the rich, developed
countries. We are poor so that they can squander. That is the gospel
truth.
They are in possession of the money for
investments, of markets and technologies. Out of every 100 new
patents, 86 are owned by developed countries. The gap, far from
diminishing, is on the rise. Let us see:
Some US$ 150 billion is needed to meet the
Millennium Goals. But the money is nowhere to be found. The
developed nations do not show the necessary political will to abide
by their commitments. Beautiful words, but not concrete facts.
However, last year they gave US$ 78 billion in Official Development
Assistance, barely 0.25% of GNP. As we know, the United States gave
only 0.1%. We, on our part:
We must give momentum to South-South cooperation
and, as a matter of fact, we have concretized some actions after the
Summit in Havana, but we must not cease to insist that the countries
in the developed North abide by their commitments. It is their
historic duty. Their wealth has resulted from our colonial
exploitation.
Third: The development-oriented proposals
contained in the document on the UN reform are totally insufficient,
lenient towards the non-compliance by the developed countries and
without any real and innovative proposals.
· There is a clear
imbalance in the priority of the issues addressed, to the
prejudice of the treatment of our right to development, our
access to markets and technologies, and a real solution to
the debt problem;
· On the other
hand, there has been a distortion in the mandate contained
in the Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly to
convene the High-Level Segment in September. An attempt is
being made to divert attention from the real fact that
developed countries do not comply with their commitments,
and that is the main cause for the non-compliance with the
Millennium Goals.
Cuba believes that it is necessary to
redirect the terms of the debate and turn the High-Level
event into a forum where these issues can be really
discussed, where the blatant default by the developed
countries can be looked into so that they are held
accountable for
it.