|
Fellow countrymen:
A peaceful solution would still be possible.
The present situation is so tense that nobody could write a
speech hours before delivery and be certain that it is not outdated. I am also
running the risk of sounding too optimistic even when I am not. However, it is
my duty to say what I think.
The unanimous shock suffered by all peoples of the world on
September 11, due to the insane terrorist attacks against the American people,
which could be seen live on television, has created exceptional conditions for
the eradication of terrorism without the need to unleash a useless and perhaps
endless war.
Terrorist actions in the United States, as anywhere else in the
world, inflict terrible damage on the peoples fighting for a cause that
objectively they consider to be fair.
Terror has always been an instrument of the worst enemies of
Mankind bent on suppressing and crushing the peoples’ struggle for freedom. It
can never be the instrument of a truly noble and just cause.
All throughout history, almost every action intended to attain
national independence, including that of the American people, was carried out
with the use of weapons and nobody ever questioned, or would question, that
right. But, the deliberate use of weapons to kill innocent people must be
definitely condemned and eradicated for it is as unworthy and inhuman as it is
repulsive, the same as the historic terrorism perpetrated by the oppressing
states.
In the present crisis, real possibilities still exist to
eradicate terrorism without a war but the main obstacle is that the most notable
political and military leaders in the United States refuse to listen to any word
said against the use of weapons and in favor of a truly effective solution to
the worrisome problem, heedless of the fact that it would be very honorable for
the American people to accomplish that objective while avoiding blood shedding.
The decision-makers are only betting on war actions. They have
associated honor with war. Some speak of the use of nuclear weapons as if it
were as simple as having a cup of tea. Others affirm that paratroopers will be
employed in irregular warfare tactics. Someone has even speculated on the
advisability of using lies as a weapon although others have shown more
rationality and common sense but still along the war line. Objectivity and
rationality are not abundant. Many people have been made to believe that only
belligerent formulas are viable regardless the loss of American lives.
It is hard to know whether the final tactic and strategy of
struggle have already been decided upon to use against a country whose
communications and technological infrastructure as well as material conditions
seem to have hardly left the Stone Age behind. Will irregular warfare tactics
with squadrons of aircraft carriers, armored warships, cruisers and submarines
be used in a landlocked country? Why send also scores of B-1 and B-52 bombers,
hundreds of modern fighter planes, thousands of missiles and other strategic
weapons? What are they going to shoot against?
Meanwhile, confusion and panic prevail in the rest of the
world, while opportunistic positions motivated by convenience and national
interests are not lacking. Some have torn their honor to pieces. And, following
the initial atmosphere of uncertainty there is a bizarre and widespread ostrich
reflex despite the fact that there are not even enough holes to hide heads.
Many seem not to have realized yet that, on September 20,
before the United States Senate, the end of independence was decreed for every
other state --without exceptions-- as well as the end of the United Nations’
role.
Nevertheless, no one should be misled into thinking that the
peoples of the world, and a number of honest political leaders, will not react
as soon as the war actions become a reality and their horrific images start to
be seen. These will then take the place of the sad and shocking images of the
events in New York at a time when forgetting them would bring irreparable damage
on the spirit of solidarity with the American people that is today a primary
element towards the eradication of terrorism, without the need to resort to a
war of unpredictable consequences and avoiding the death of an incalculable
number of innocents.
The first victims can already be seen. They are the millions
trying to escape the war and the dying children with ghastly appearance whose
images will move the world to pity without anyone being able to prevent their
dissemination.
It is a great mistake on the part of the United States and its
NATO allies to believe that the strong nationalism and religious sentiments of
Muslims can be neutralized with either money or a promise of assistance, or that
their countries can be permanently intimidated by force. There are already
statements from religious leaders of major nations, that have no affinity
whatsoever with the Taliban, who are voicing their resolute opposition to a
military attack. Meanwhile, contradictions are beginning to arise among the
United States’ allies, both in Center and South East Asia.
On the other hand, xenophobia, hatred and scorn for every
Muslim country are starting to emerge. An important European head of government
has just said in Berlin that Western civilization is superior to Islamic and
that the West will keep on conquering peoples, even if that means confrontation
with the Islamic civilization, which has remained stuck where it was 1400 years
ago.
In an economic situation such as the world is experiencing
today, when extremely serious problems affecting Mankind remain unresolved,
including its own survival which is threatened by other evils unrelated to the
destructive power of modern weaponry, one wonders: Why this obstinate course of
starting a complicated and open-ended war? Why are the American leaders showing
such arrogance when their enormous power gives them the privilege of showing
some moderation?
It would suffice to return to the United Nations Organization
the prerogatives that it has been deprived of and let the General Assembly, its
most universal and representative body, be the center of that fight for peace
--regardless of its limitations due to the arbitrary veto right of the Security
Council standing members, most of them also a part of NATO-- and for the
eradication of terrorism with total and unanimous support from the world
opinion.
Under no circumstances should those responsible for the brutal
attacks against the American people be allowed to go unpunished, if they can be
identified. An honorable condition for every country would be that they are
tried by an unbiased court of law that would ensure the reliability of the
evidence and that justice be done.
Cuba was the first country to speak of the need for an
international struggle against terrorism just a few hours after the tragedy
brought on the American people on September 11. We also said that: "None of the
present problems of the world can be solved by force. [...] The international
community should build a world conscience against terrorism. [...] Only the
intelligent policy of seeking strength through consensus and the international
public opinion can decidedly uproot this problem [...] this unimaginable event
should serve to launch an international struggle against terrorism. ...] The
world cannot be saved unless a path of international peace and cooperation is
pursued."
We firmly stand by these views.
It is indispensable to return to the United Nations its role in
the attainment of peace.
I harbor no doubts that the Third World countries --I dare say
almost everyone of them without exception, despite their political and religious
differences-- would be willing to go alongside the rest of the world in this
struggle against terrorism as an alternative to war.
I think that these ideas do not, in any way, tarnish the honor,
the dignity and the predominant political or religious principles of any of the
above-mentioned states.
I am not talking here on behalf of any of the poor and
underdeveloped countries of the world. I am simply expressing my deepest
conviction as I am aware of the tragedy of these peoples that have been
exploited and humiliated for centuries where, even without a war, inherited
poverty and underdevelopment, hunger and curable diseases are silently killing
scores of millions of innocents every year.
For these people, saving peace with dignity, with independence
and without a war is the cornerstone of the struggle that we should wage
together for a truly just world of free peoples.
Cuba is not motivated by any economic interest or by
opportunism, much less by any fear of threat, danger or risk. But this people
that, as it is widely known, has most honorably endured over four decades of
economic warfare, blockade and terrorism is entitled to explain, reiterate and
insist on its viewpoints; and, it will not hesitate to do so until the very last
minute.
We are, and we will continue to be, opposed to terrorism and
opposed to war! No matter what happens, nothing will separate us from that
line!
The dark clouds on the horizon of the world today, will not
prevent the Cubans from continuing to work restlessly on our wonderful social
and cultural programs as we are persuaded that it is a human endeavor
unparalleled in history. And even if the promised wars were to turn them into
mere dreams, we would still fall with honor defending such dreams.
Long live the Revolution and Socialism!
Patria o Muerte!
Venceremos!
|