|

Due to time constraints, we are publishing the following text as
it was written, without including the reflections, additions and comments made
during its presentation.
Madame President and other members of the Presidency;
Distinguished Parliamentarians:
When I spoke at the 68th Inter-Parliamentary
Conference in 1981, after mentioning a number of figures and statistics that
illustrated the growing gap separating the developed, wealthy world from the
countries that were formerly its colonies and domains, victims of relentless
plunder for centuries, I made a statement that might have seemed excessive: "If
the present is tragic, the future looks dismal."
Let nobody try to fool or confuse us with the new terminology
spawned by the hypocritical propaganda of specialists in deception and lies,
working in the service of those who have subjected humanity to an increasingly
unequal and unfair economic and political order, one that is completely devoid
of solidarity or democracy or even an iota of respect for the minimum rights
owed to human beings.
I was not exaggerating when I made that statement. The Third
World’s foreign debt, which totaled some 500 billion dollars in 1981, had
reached 2.1 trillion dollars in the year 2000. The share corresponding to Latin
America was 255.188 billion dollars in 1981; by 2000, it was 750.855
billion.
The servicing of the Third World debt, which amounted to 44.2
billion USD in 1981, had reached 347.4 billion USD in 2000.
The per capita gross national product (GDP) in the developed
countries was 8,070 USD in 1978. Twenty years later, in 1998, per capita GDP in
those countries had grown to 25,870 USD. In the meantime, the per capita GDP in
the countries with the lowest incomes, which was 200 USD in 1978, had risen to
only 530 USD by the year 1998. The abysmal gap had grown even wider.
The number of undernourished people, almost all of whom live in
Third World countries, rose from 570 million in 1981 to 800 million in 2000.
The number of unemployed grew from 1.103 billion in 1981 to 1.6
billion in 2000.
Today, the wealthiest 20% of the world’s population accounts
for 86% of all spending on private consumption, while the poorest 20% accounts
for only 1.3%.
In the wealthy countries, per capita electricity consumption is
10 times higher than in all the poor countries combined.
According to United Nations figures, in 1960 the income of 20%
of the world population living in the wealthiest nations was 30 times that of
the poorest nations; by 1997 it was 74 times greater.
Studies carried out by the FAO between 1987 and 1998 reveal
that two out of every five children in the underdeveloped world suffer from
growth retardation, while one out of every three is underweight for his or her
age.
There are 1.3 billion poor people in the Third World, that is,
one out of every three lives in poverty. The World Bank, in its latest report on
poverty, predicts that the number of people living in absolute poverty could
reach 1.5 billion as the New Millennium begins.
The wealthiest 25% of the world’s population consumes 45% of
all meat and fish; the poorest 25% consumes only 5%.
In sub-Saharan Africa, infant mortality rate is 107 per 1000
live births during the first year of life, and 173 per thousand live births
before the age of five. In South Asia, the rates are 76 and 114, respectively.
In the case of Latin America, according to UNICEF, infant mortality before the
age of five is 39 per 1000 live births.
More than 800 million adults remain illiterate.
More than 130 million school-age children are growing up
without access to basic education.
The truth, which cannot be hidden, is that there are currently
over 800 million people suffering chronic hunger while lacking access to health
care services, which is why it is estimated that 507 million people living in
the Third World today will not live past 40 years of age. South of the Sahara,
almost 30% of the population will die before they are 40.
In 1981, climate change was seldom mentioned, and very few
people had ever even heard the word AIDS. Today these are two harrowing threats
that have been added to the calamities already mentioned.
In 1981, the world population had surpassed four billion; 75%
of them living in Third World countries. Today, in 2001, there are already more
than 6.1 billion of us on the planet. In just 20 years, the world population
grew by 1.7 billion, more than it had grown since the emergence of the human
species until the beginning of the 20th century.
In short, the world income share of the countries that now
constitute the Third World has shrunk so much that a century and a half ago it
was 56%, while today it is only 15%. This is truly a peculiar way of expressing
the real meaning for the Third World and the immense majority of humanity of
capitalism and imperialism, with their crises, chaos, economic anarchy and
selfish and inhuman value system.
Then, after four centuries of Spanish colonial domination and
57 years as a United States colony, our country, a poor nation, has been
subjected to a brutal economic blockade from the very moment that, for the first
time in history, we achieved our double freedom, for we freed ourselves from
both the tyrany and the empire.
This small and blockaded Third World country, against which the
United States has used all of its resources in terms of subversion,
destabilization, sabotage, pirate attacks, hundreds of plots to assassinate the
Revolution’s leaders, a dirty war, economic warfare, biological warfare, a
military invasion using personnel recruited, paid, supplied, escorted by U.S.
naval units and directed by the U.S. government, and ultimately the very real
threat of nuclear extermination, has succeeded in honorably withstanding all of
the blows dealt to it by the major superpower in history, a Rome multiplied by a
thousand, given its political, economic, military and technological power.
This merciless economic war and the blockade have now lasted 42
years. In addition to this, we have endured ten years of a special period, after
the collapse of the socialist camp and disintegration of the Soviet Union left
us devoid of markets and sources of supplies. And it was under these
circumstances that the United States even further tightened the blockade with
the Torricelli and Helms-Burton Acts. No country has ever withstood such a
trial.
Many believed that we were but a simple satellite of a great
power. The fall of the Revolution was expected within a matter of weeks, or
months at the most. But the satellite proved that it had its own light, and its
own extraordinary power, like a small sun of true freedom, sovereignty,
patriotism, social justice, real equality of opportunities, solidarity within
and beyond its borders, and unshakable ethical and human principles.
Did this power, this enormous prestige, this strength and unity
of the people, achieved through the Revolution, serve to satisfy personal
vanity, or greed for power or material goods? No, it served to heroically
withstand the assault launched by the empire at one of the most dangerous and
difficult moments in the history of our country.
Let no one even try to give us lessons on history and politics,
treating Cuba’s leaders like preschool children. It is even possible that Cuban
preschool children know more about these matters than some well-known
politicians.
Under horrendous circumstances, a social project has been
carried out that is overwhelming, irrefutable, insurmountable. Illiteracy was
eradicated in just one year, in a country where almost a third of the population
between the ages of 15 and 60 could not read and write. At the same time,
thousands of classrooms were created in isolated places and almost inaccessible
regions. Medical services were also established in the countryside and the
cities, despite the fact that the United States had taken away half the 6000
doctors in the country at the time and over half of the medical school
professors, with visas and promises of a better material life. Thousands of
schools were built, and teachers and professors were trained for elementary
school, junior and senior high school education, polytechnic institutes,
training centers for teachers and professors of music, dance, art, physical
education, sports, and other subjects. Dozens of higher education institutions
were established throughout the country, where there had previously been only
three. These included 21 medical schools – which now total 22, with the creation
of the Latin American School of Medical Sciences --and 15 university level
teacher-training schools.
In less than 30 years, Cuba became the first country in Latin
America and the Third World to reduce infant mortality to less than 10 per 1000
life births in the first year of life, achieving a rate of 6.4, and life
expectancy of 75, in the very midst of the special period. Cuba has brought free
medical care to all its citizens; raised the average educational level to the
ninth grade; graduated over 700,000 university-trained professionals; developed
a powerful artistic and cultural movement; and placed among the top ten
countries in the Olympics, winning more gold medals per capita than any other.
In regional competitions and international events, Cuba has garnered thousands
of medals, occupying second place in this hemisphere, behind the United States.
Its children achieve top scores in mathematics and science competitions.
According to UNESCO research, our primary school students have
almost twice as much knowledge as the average student in the rest of Latin
America. Today our country is first among all countries in the world, both
developed and underdeveloped, in terms of the number of professors and teachers,
doctors, and high-level physical education and sports instructors. These are
three decisive areas for the wellbeing and social and economic development of
any nation.
In all, we have 250,000 educators, 67,500 medical doctors, and
34,000 physical education and sports professors and technicians.
Presently, we are sharing this immense human capital with our
sister nations of the Third World, without charging a cent. (APPLAUSE) Our
cooperants working overseas boast not only extensive technical and scientific
capacity, but also the most important traits of all: extraordinary human
solidarity and an unsurpassed spirit of sacrifice.
Hundreds of thousands of our compatriots have discharged
internationalist missions in many Third World countries, particularly in Africa,
as technical personnel and especially as combatants against colonialism and the
racist, fascist apartheid system.
You may be wondering why I am elaborating so much on these
facts.
Firstly: Because I wonder if this is why some try to condemn us
every year in Geneva.
Secondly: Because I wonder if this is why we have been
subjected to harassment, economic warfare and a blockade for 42 years now.
Thirdly: Because I wonder if this is why some want to destroy
the Cuban Revolution.
I should add something else. In 42 years of Revolution, not
once has there been a case of tear gas used against the people, or the spectacle
of police with riot gear, horses or armored cars suppressing the people, things
that are seen very frequently in Europe and the United States. There have never
been death squads in our country, nor a single missing person, nor a single
political assassination, nor a single victim of torture, despite the thousands
of brazen lies disseminated by a frustrated and unscrupulous empire that would
like to wipe the image and example of Cuba off the face of Earth.
You may travel around the country, ask the people, look for a
single piece of evidence, try to find a single case where the Revolutionary
government has ordered or tolerated such an action, and if you find them, then I
will never speak in public again.
Only a fool would believe that the Cuban people could be
governed by force or in any way other than through the consensus that arises
from the work achieved, the elevated political consciousness of our people and
the enviable relationship between the masses and their leadership. In the
elections for the Assemblies of People’s Power, over 95% of the country’s
eligible voters willingly and enthusiastically cast their ballots.
The ethics and politics of imperialism are quite a different
matter.
When Cuban troops were fighting in Angola, in 1988, at a time
of the decisive battle against the South African troops was being waged in Cuito
Cuanavale and 40,000 Cuban soldiers and 30,000 Angolans were marching on the
Namibian border in southwest Angola, the racist South Africans had seven nuclear
warheads similar to the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. NATO knew it,
the United States knew it, but no one said a word about it, in the hopes that
they would be used against the Cuban-Angolan forces.
During the 15 long years we were in southern Africa, mounting
the guard against the forces of apartheid or actively fighting them, the major
capitalist countries had large investments in South Africa and their trade with
this racist regime amounted to billions of USD every year. The U.S. investments
in South Africa at that time totaled three billion USD and their annual trade
six billion, while an additional three billion USD in bank credits were granted
to that country.
It is common knowledge that the United States was a military
ally of South Africa – could this possibly be forgotten? -- and that through
South Africa it supplied UNITA with copious sums in weapons, including portable
anti-aircraft missiles and millions of anti-personnel mines, which it planted
throughout Angolan territory. UNITA wiped out entire villages and killed
hundreds of thousands of civilians, including women and children. I am not
exaggerating in the slightest.
Once Cuba’s internationalist mission had been concluded with
honor, and an agreement had been reached that led to the implementation of UN
resolution 435, and to Namibian independence, we rigorously complied with the
commitments made by the parties involved and withdrew our forces. And when our
forces left Africa, they took nothing with them but the remains of their
comrades who had fallen in combat. We did not own a single square meter of land
there – as I said a few days ago – or a single screw in a factory. No Western
country had shed a single drop of blood there. Only one country had done this, a
small and faraway country, located 10,000 kilometers from Africa: Cuba.
(APPLAUSE)
And now, added to everything I said at the beginning of this
speech about the dramatic economic and social situation currently facing the
peoples of the Third World, there are the arrogant steps taken by the new U.S.
administration in the international sphere. These could create serious
complications at a moment when the international economy, and above all the U.S.
economy, is facing a serious threat of stagnation, recession and crisis. The
effects of this are already beginning to be felt around the world, in the form
of drops in the volume of exports, falling prices for basic commodities, a fall
in stock prices, and massive layoffs and downsizing everywhere.
The most serious events have taken place over the course of
just a few weeks.
First: The decision to create a nuclear missile shield, which
would unilaterally break the commitments entered into under the ABM Treaty, and
inexorably lead to an arms race.
Second: The decision to veto the draft resolution proposing the
establishment of an observer force for the protection of the Palestinian people
(APPLAUSE), which was backed by China, Russia and seven other members of the
Security Council, with four abstentions, including two other permanent members.
Since May of 1990, the United States has exercised its right to
veto on five occasions, four of them in relation to the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict. The last time the United States applied its veto was on March 21,
1997, in support of Israeli interests and to the detriment of the Palestinians,
against a resolution demanding that Israel stopped the building of a settlement
in East Jerusalem.
Since 1972, the United States has used its veto on 23 occasions
against resolutions aimed at solving the Palestinian issue.
The complicated situation in the Middle East has been further
aggravated by this latest U.S. veto, when an extreme right-wing government has
just taken power in Israel.
Third: The equally unilateral decision to break the commitments
made at the third session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change, held in Kyoto in late 1997, when 34
industrialized countries agreed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2%
by the year 2012 – a goal that is crucial for humanity. The United States had
committed itself to reducing those emissions by 7%. This was a real blow to
world public opinion, especially to the European countries which had made the
greatest contributions to this Convention for the reduction of greenhouse gas
emissions.
Fourth: Official statements that are insulting and humiliating
for Russia and China, using typical cold war language, a reflection of the
mentality clearly surfacing in many of the members of the team surrounding and
advising the current president of the United States.
Fifth: Tangible contempt, which cannot be disguised, towards
Latin America, in proposing as the new administration’s assistant
under-Secretary of State for Latin American affairs a sinester individual, with
a fascist mentality. That man is notorious for his participation alongside
Oliver North as a special public opinion advisor to the Secretary of State
during the Reagan administration, at the time of the scandal involving the sale
of weapons to raise funds for the dirty war against the Sandinista government in
Nicaragua. These arms sales were in fact prohibited at the time by agreements
adopted by the U.S. Congress itself. He has published documents and statements
that he had signed with the name of Nicaraguan counterrevolutionary leaders,
some of whom could neither read nor write, he has broken the law, and showed a
total lack of ethics. Quite a number of U.S. press agencies have harshly
criticized this decision, and many Latin American leaders are not at all happy
about it.
In any event, these steps clearly reflect the traits and
personality of the new occupant of the presidential throne in the United States
of America.
None of this comes as a surprise to Cuba. We are well aware of
Mr. Bush’s close ties with and commitments to the Cuban-American National
Foundation, a terrorist mob – I repeat, a terrorist mob -- that financed the
planting of bombs in hotels in Havana, several of which went off, with the aim
of destroying the Cuban tourism industry. This same Foundation organized the
plot to assassinate yours truly at the Margarita Island Summit. The would-be
perpetrators of the plot were accidentally picked up by the U.S. Coast Guard –
perhaps they believing they were carrying drugs -- off the coast of Puerto Rico,
on the way to fulfilling their mission. They themselves have declared what they
planned to do and who had organized the plot, but despite all irrefutable proof,
they were acquitted.
The Foundation’s latest major misdeed was the assassination
plot against my modest person organized on the occasion of the Ibero-American
Summit in Panama last November. This time they used the most notorious terrorist
in the hemisphere, the author of the blowing up of a Cuban plane in mid-flight
on October 6, 1976. A total of 73 people were killed, including the entire Cuban
juvenile fencing team, returning home from Venezuela after winning all the gold
medals in the Central American and Caribbean Games. This time, powerful
explosives were brought from El Salvador, to be set off in the University of
Panama while I was speaking to the students there. The plot was timely exposed
leading to the arrest of the group leader and three other Cuban-born terrorists
members of the Miami mob with a long and bloody history in the service of the
U.S. special agencies. The U.S. authorities and government are fully aware of
the truth of what I am saying.
This past January 3, a bill was introduced in the House of
Representatives Foreign Relations Committee by Representative Bob Barr. The aim
of the bill is to overturn an executive order issued by the Ford Administration
on February 18, 1976, concerning U.S. intelligence activities overseas. Section
5, paragraph g) of this executive order expressly states that no employee of the
U.S. government is to participate or conspire to participate in political
assassinations.
Who is Bob Barr? A Republican representative for the state of
Arial. He worked for the CIA and in 1986 was appointed byReagan U.S. district
attorney for northern Arial. He is a life member of the National Rifle
Association and a member of its board of directors. He has been honored as the
Congressional Leader of the Year by the U.S. Shooting Sports Council; Legislator
of the Year by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (the
same ones used by children to kill each other in school after being bombarded
with violent messages by the mass media); and New Legislator of the Year by the
Conservative Political Action Committee.
The Miami terrorist mob and extreme right in the United States
are feverishly at work drafting plans, bills and repressive measures against
Cuba. These machinations openly include direct ties with the so-called Cuban
opposition and the allocation of millions of dollars to finance subversion and
destabilization in our country. Let no one be mistaken: Cuba will adopt the
necessary measures to respond.
The U.S. government dirty hands have kept busy doing everything
possible to provoke conflict and to disrupt this conference. They have even
tried to use it to serve their own treacherous purposes.
U.S. embassies around the world weresent letters to an
unspecified number of parliamentarians scheduled to participate in this
conference. Friendly hands brought them to the attention of our authorities.
One of them reads as follows:
"Your visit to Cuba for the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)
meeting represents a unique opportunity for you to show solidarity with Cuban
democracy and human rights activists.
"As you know, your colleague, Czech MP Ivan Pilip, was arrested
and held for three weeks by the Cuban secret police in February for the ‘crime’
of meeting with democratic activists.
"After the intervention of IPU Syg Johnsson (sic) and IPU Human
Rights Commission President Letelier, the Cubans decided to release Pilip and
his colleague, Jan Bubenik.
"The IPU is thus directly linked to the human rights situation
on the island, and has a chance now to send a principled and clear message of
the IPU support and that of your parliament for human rights and Cuba by meeting
with said activists. During the 1999 Ibero-American Summit in Havana, a number
of Latin American leaders similarly reached out to the Cuban activists. This
effort sent a clear signal and was a boost to the activists.
"We know that internationally highly-respected activists like
Elizardo Sánchez and Marta Beatriz Roque are eager to meet with foreign
parliamentarians to express their views on the prospects for democratic and
economic opening."
Another letter includes the following statements:
"While many hoped that Cuba’s human rights situation would
improve after the January 1998 visit of the Pope, it has actually
deteriorated.
"This deterioration has increased over the past six months;
hundreds of activists have been detained since December alone."
"Hundreds remain incarcerated, most for innocuous acts, like
passing out copies of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights.
"Cuba recently cancelled a visit by German Deputy Foreign
Minister Volmer because he dared suggest that he would raise human rights issues
on his trip.
"Cuba lashed out against Argentina in February after an
Argentine newspaper claimed that Argentina would support a United Nations
Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) resolution on Cuba.
"Earlier this year, a Czech member of parliament, Ivan Pilip,
and former member of parliament Jan Bubenik, were detained for over three weeks
in January, simply for meeting with Cuban activists and independent
journalists."
"No U.S. member of Congress has participated in an IPU event in
a decade.
"In 1998, the U.S. Congress determined to terminate its IPU
membership unless the U.S. contribution to the organization were reduced.
"The contribution was not reduced, so in October 2000, the IPU
secretary general was informed formally of U.S. intention to terminate its
membership effective immediately."
After reading these documents, there can be no doubt as to who
is conspiring, who is organizing, who is lying, who is plotting, who is paying,
and who is calling the shots. (APPLAUSE)
It takes no great effort to comprehend the extent to which the
arrogance, frustration and endless failures of the U.S. government have led it
to disrespect international institutions, provoke conflict and interfere with
international organizations and the domestic affairs of other countries.
They have been recruiting mercenaries for four decades now.
Today our people are more united and the Revolution is stronger than ever. All
of the conspiracies, plots and crimes aimed against our country will simply
crash up against this strength. We will continue to expose their maneuvers and
denounce their treachery and lies, and we will not hesitate to accuse and expose
their accomplices. No one will be exempt from the most fair and appalling
censure, no matter how high-placed; no economic interest or threat of reprisal
will override our people’s dignity and courage. Thus, we do not hesitate to
describe as disgustingly hypocritical the behavior of those who resort to the
naïve and ridiculous maneuver of using their condemnation of the blockade as a
fig leaf to cover the infamy of accusing Cuba of alleged violations of human
rights.
Nothing can ever justify cowardice and lies.
Cuba scorns those who behave this way. We are not interested in
the votes against the blockade of those who hypocritically support the arguments
with which the empire attempts to justify its crimes.
Nothing ever has or ever will succeed in defeating the dignity,
ethics and heroism of a people who have written an indelible page in the history
of this era. (APPLAUSE)
I am deeply grateful for the noble company of the many highly
worthy parliamentarians who have honored us with their presence and inspired us
with their solidarity.
I hope you will forgive me for all the time I have taken.
I am eternally grateful.
I wish this excellent conference all of the success it
deserves.
Hasta la victoria siempre!
Thank you very much.
(OVATION)
|